While perusing a bookstore a couple years ago, I stumbled upon a fascinating book by Douglas Hofstadter called Godel, Escher, Bach. If you like math, biology, music, art, computer science, and philosophy, this is really an amazing read (though, admittedly, I’ve only gotten halfway through since I bought the thing).

In one of the book’s entertaining conversations between Achilles and the Tortoise (this conversation regarding number theory), the Tortoise tells Achilles about a number property that he calls Wondrousness. A number is found to be Wondrous if, when following a specific algorithm (below), you can turn that number into 1. That number is Unwonderous if you can’t reach 1. The point of the characters’ ensuing discussion is that there is no “terminating test” for the property of Wondrousness; you could never know for sure that a number is Unwonderous because you have no idea how long it would take to reach 1 if it was, in fact, Wondrous instead.

The algorithm in question is this: Take a number ** N**. If that number is odd, take it

**times 3**and

**add 1**. If that number is instead even,

**divide**it by

**2**. Continue this process until

**.**

*N*=1The point, for this post, is that Achilles and the Tortoise demonstrate the above algorithm on the number 15, finding that it takes 17 steps to get to a value of 1. The Tortoise then warns that trying the same with the number 27 will require a large sheet of paper, but otherwise no more examples are given. So, I thought it would be an interesting exercise to write a short Python script to run the algorithm on a large set of numbers, and then plot the number of steps taken to get to 1 for each number.

The Python script I put together looks like this:

def is_even( num ): """Return True if num is even, else return False.""" if num % 2 == 0: return True else: return False def wonder( num ): """Return the number of Wondrous steps to get to 1""" num, count = int(num), 0 while num != 1: # stop looping once num == 1 count += 1 if is_even(num): num /= 2 else: num = 3*num + 1 return count def main(): with open(input('Save as: '),'w') as save: save.write('N\tSteps\n') # column headings for i in range(1,int('Test Wondrousness of number 1-')+1,1): save.write(str(i)+'\t'+str(wonder(i))+'\n') print('Completed.') main()

You can just copy this script into a text file and save it as **wondrous.py** or similar (I’m assuming you are running Python 3.X). When you run the script, you’ll be prompted to give a Save Name for the output, which will be a text file containing a first column of the numbers tested for Wondrousness, and a second column of the corresponding number of steps required to get to 1 (when following the algorithm above).

You will then give the script the last number in the range from 1 to whatever that you’d like to test. I ran this with 1 million and it only took a few minutes to generate the file, though I’ll warn you that actually plotting this many datapoints may cause your computer all kinds of problems. Perhaps start with 10 thousand (I used 100,000 in the plot below). For the sake of this post, I’ll say that the Save Name that you gave was **wondrous_nums.txt**. I suspect that most spreadsheet software can’t handle columns with a million entries, so I’m going to plot this dataset in R (R is superior anyway).

If you’re following along, first open up R and then change the directory to the one containing your dataset (the Desktop, in my case):

You only need a few R commands at this point, which are simple enough to be self-explanatory even if you a’re unfamiliar with R (you can just copy-paste it in):

data = read.table( 'wondrous_nums.txt', header=TRUE )

`pdf( 'wondrous_nums_plot.pdf', width=6, height=5)`

plot( data$N, data$Steps, main='Wondrousness',

ylab='Steps Taken', xlab='Input Value', pch=20, cex=.3)

`dev.off() #closes the pdf file you made`

That pdf( blah blah) line makes R save to a pdf file, instead of trying to draw the file itself (which can take a while). Below is the plot generated by these R lines, with a dataset of 100,000 points:

Cool, right? There’s clearly some sort of a pattern there, though I have no idea how to go about defining it. Perhaps it has been done already…